wattle and daub
0 sources
wattle and daub
Summary
wattle and daub is a building method[1]. It ranks in the top 10% of building_method entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (798 views/month).[2]
Key Facts
- wattle and daub's image is recorded as Mur en torchis.JPG[3].
- wattle and daub's instance of is recorded as building method[4].
- wattle and daub's instance of is recorded as process[5].
- wattle and daub's made from material is recorded as loam[6].
- wattle and daub's made from material is recorded as Clematis[7].
- wattle and daub's made from material is recorded as wattle[8].
- wattle and daub's made from material is recorded as clay[9].
- wattle and daub's subclass of is recorded as wall[10].
- wattle and daub's Commons category is recorded as Wattle and daub[11].
- wattle and daub's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/02f8w3[12].
- wattle and daub's Art & Architecture Thesaurus ID is recorded as 300010629[13].
- wattle and daub's Art & Architecture Thesaurus ID is recorded as 300010630[14].
- wattle and daub's described by source is recorded as Encyclopædia Britannica 11th edition[15].
- wattle and daub's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as technology/wattle-and-daub[16].
- wattle and daub's different from is recorded as furring[17].
- wattle and daub's different from is recorded as mudbrick[18].
- wattle and daub's EAGLE id is recorded as objtyp/lod/323[19].
- wattle and daub's BabelNet ID is recorded as 00080684n[20].
- wattle and daub's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as wattle-and-daub[21].
- wattle and daub's PACTOLS thesaurus ID is recorded as pcrtK8tO0rlQlM[22].
- wattle and daub's LC and MARC vocabularies ID is recorded as ethnographicTerms/afset019960[23].
- wattle and daub's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 156202196[24].
- wattle and daub's Joconde object type ID is recorded as T505-4034[25].
- wattle and daub's Lex ID is recorded as lerklining[26].
- wattle and daub's Grove Art Online ID is recorded as T090865[27].
Why It Matters
wattle and daub ranks in the top 10% of building_method entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (798 views/month).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 16 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[28] It is known by 6 alternative names across languages and contexts.[29]