voting paradox (Condorcet)
Marquis de Condorcet's observation regarding times when voters' collective preferences are cyclic, even when voters' individual preferences are not
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
voting paradox (Condorcet)
Summary
voting paradox (Condorcet) is a paradox[1]. voting paradox (Condorcet) draws 230 Wikipedia views per month (paradox category, ranking #32 of 104).[2]
Key Facts
- voting paradox (Condorcet) is credited with the discovery of Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat de Condorcet[3].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s instance of is recorded as paradox[4].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s instance of is recorded as scientific theory[5].
- Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat de Condorcet is named after voting paradox (Condorcet)[6].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s Commons category is recorded as Condorcet paradox[7].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s Freebase ID is recorded as /m/080lx[8].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s different from is recorded as Downs' paradox of voting[9].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s PhilPapers topic is recorded as condorcets-paradox[10].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s Quora topic ID is recorded as Voting-Paradox[11].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s JSTOR topic ID is recorded as voting-paradox[12].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s STW Thesaurus for Economics ID is recorded as 10088-3[13].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 87909705[14].
- voting paradox (Condorcet)'s Namuwiki ID is recorded as 투표의 역설[15].
Body
Works and Contributions
voting paradox (Condorcet) is credited with the discovery of Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat de Condorcet[3].
Why It Matters
voting paradox (Condorcet) draws 230 Wikipedia views per month (paradox category, ranking #32 of 104).[2] voting paradox (Condorcet) has Wikipedia articles in 20 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[16] voting paradox (Condorcet) is known by 18 alternative names across languages and contexts.[17]