Home › Entities › academia › Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis

Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis

Research article (Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2018) · cited 15× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W2782495611
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis

Summary

Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing
MLA “Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis — https://4ort.xyz/entity/visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/visual-auditory-differences-in-duration-discrimination-depend-on-modality-specific-sensory-automatic-temporal-processing · Last refreshed: