The Casimir Pulaski Foundation
0 sources
The Casimir Pulaski Foundation
Summary
The Casimir Pulaski Foundation is a think tank[1]. It draws 7 Wikipedia views per month (think_tank category, ranking #80 of 207).[2]
Key Facts
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation is in the country of Poland[3].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's instance of is recorded as think tank[4].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's instance of is recorded as foundation[5].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's instance of is recorded as organization[6].
- Casimir Pulaski is named after The Casimir Pulaski Foundation[7].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's headquarters location is recorded as Warsaw[8].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's VIAF cluster ID is recorded as 316028073[9].
- +2004-00-00T00:00:00Z marks the founding of The Casimir Pulaski Foundation[10].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's official website is recorded as https://pulaski.pl/[11].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's NUKAT ID is recorded as n2015063259[12].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's legal form is recorded as fundacja[13].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's Instagram username is recorded as pulaskifoundation[14].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's EU Transparency Register ID is recorded as 407321843479-18[15].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's Google Knowledge Graph ID is recorded as /g/122093xv[16].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's ROR ID is recorded as 00pqhg146[17].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's funder is recorded as Open Society Foundations[18].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's funder is recorded as Open Society Foundations[19].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's funder is recorded as Open Society Foundations[20].
- The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's funder is recorded as Open Society Foundations[21].
Body
Founding
+2004-00-00T00:00:00Z marks the founding of The Casimir Pulaski Foundation[10].
Operations
The Casimir Pulaski Foundation's headquarters location is recorded as Warsaw[8].
Why It Matters
The Casimir Pulaski Foundation draws 7 Wikipedia views per month (think_tank category, ranking #80 of 207).[2]