Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives
0 sources
Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives
Summary
Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives is a literary work[1]. It ranks in the top 4% of literary_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (71 views/month).[2]
Key Facts
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives authored Forty Tales from the Afterlives — author (P50): David Eagleman[3].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's instance of is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — instance of (P31): literary work[4].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's publisher is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — publisher (P123): Pantheon Books[5].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's genre is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — genre (P136): speculative fiction[6].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's language of work or name is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — language of work or name (P407): English[7].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's country of origin is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — country of origin (P495): United States[8].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's publication date is recorded as +2009-02-00T00:00:00Z[9].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/04yct1b[10].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's Open Library ID is recorded as OL11958215W[11].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's has edition or translation is recorded as Forty Tales from the Afterlives — has edition or translation (P747): Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives[12].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's LibraryThing work ID is recorded as 7682794[13].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's title is recorded as Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives[14].
- Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives's Goodreads work ID is recorded as 5014561[15].
Body
Works and Contributions
Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives authored Forty Tales from the Afterlives — author (P50): David Eagleman[3].
Why It Matters
Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives ranks in the top 4% of literary_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (71 views/month).[2]