Sepia bandensis
species of mollusc
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Sepia bandensis
Summary
Sepia bandensis is a taxon[1]. It ranks in the top 0.81% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (43 views/month, #1,591 of 195,241).[2]
Key Facts
- Sepia bandensis's image is recorded as Dwarf cuttlefish (Sepia bandensis).JPG[3].
- Sepia bandensis's instance of is recorded as taxon[4].
- Sepia bandensis's taxon rank is recorded as species[5].
- Sepia bandensis's IUCN conservation status is recorded as Data Deficient[6].
- Sepia bandensis's parent taxon is recorded as Sepia[7].
- Sepia bandensis's taxon name is recorded as Sepia bandensis[8].
- Sepia bandensis's Commons category is recorded as Sepia bandensis[9].
- Sepia bandensis's IUCN taxon ID is recorded as 162605[10].
- Sepia bandensis's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/09v2h60[11].
- Sepia bandensis's NCBI taxonomy ID is recorded as 1736054[12].
- Sepia bandensis's ITIS TSN is recorded as 555968[13].
- Sepia bandensis's GBIF taxon ID is recorded as 2290774[14].
- Sepia bandensis's WoRMS-ID for taxa is recorded as 342114[15].
- Sepia bandensis's short name is recorded as {'lang': 'mul', 'text': 'S. bandensis'}[16].
- Sepia bandensis's taxon common name is recorded as {'lang': 'es', 'text': 'Sepia achaparrada'}[17].
- Sepia bandensis's taxon common name is recorded as {'lang': 'fr', 'text': 'Seiche trapue'}[18].
- Sepia bandensis's taxon common name is recorded as {'lang': 'en', 'text': 'Stumpy Cuttlefish'}[19].
- Sepia bandensis's UMLS CUI is recorded as C4344817[20].
- Sepia bandensis's iNaturalist taxon ID is recorded as 142747[21].
- Sepia bandensis's IRMNG ID is recorded as 10459528[22].
- Sepia bandensis's SeaLifeBase ID is recorded as 57588[23].
- Sepia bandensis's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 2780017198[24].
- Sepia bandensis's OBIS ID is recorded as 342114[25].
- Sepia bandensis's Open Tree of Life ID is recorded as 2868417[26].
- Sepia bandensis's Catalogue of Life ID is recorded as 4WQH2[27].
Why It Matters
Sepia bandensis ranks in the top 0.81% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (43 views/month, #1,591 of 195,241).[2]