Home › Entities › general › scientific controversy

scientific controversy

substantial disagreement among scientists
Thing general Q2996078
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

scientific controversy

Summary

scientific controversy ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (22 views/month).[1]

Key Facts

  • scientific controversy's subclass of is recorded as controversy[2].
  • scientific controversy's Commons category is recorded as Scientific controversies[3].
  • scientific controversy's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0bb4lg[4].
  • scientific controversy's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Scientific controversies[5].
  • scientific controversy's Iconclass notation is recorded as 49C4[6].
  • scientific controversy's has characteristic is recorded as matter of dispute[7].
  • scientific controversy's Encyclopædia Universalis ID is recorded as controverses-scientifiques-publiques[8].
  • scientific controversy's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 2776744675[9].

Why It Matters

scientific controversy ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (22 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 5 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[10] It is known by 16 alternative names across languages and contexts.[11]

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  2. [3] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  3. [4] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Aggregate / graph-position facts

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikimedia Foundation. dumps.wikimedia.org.
  2. [10] ↑ . Wikidata sitelinks. wikidata.org.
  3. [11] ↑ . Wikidata aliases. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). scientific controversy. Retrieved April 10, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/scientific-controversy
MLA “scientific controversy.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 10 Apr. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/scientific-controversy.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_scientific-controversy_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{scientific controversy}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/scientific-controversy}, note = {Accessed: 2026-04-10}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): scientific controversy — https://4ort.xyz/entity/scientific-controversy (retrieved 2026-04-10)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/scientific-controversy · Last refreshed: