Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation
lawsuit concerning a disputed artwork
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation
Summary
Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation is a lawsuit[1].
Key Facts
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation is in the country of United States[2].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's instance of is recorded as lawsuit[3].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's instance of is recorded as occurrence[4].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's instance of is recorded as legal case[5].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's instance of is recorded as judgment[6].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's instance of is recorded as claim for restitution of an artwork[7].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's location is recorded as New York City[8].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's significant event is recorded as judgment[9].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's main subject is recorded as legal case[10].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's main subject is recorded as Portrait of Ángel Fernández de Soto[11].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's main subject is recorded as claim for restitution of an artwork[12].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's described at URL is recorded as https://archive.is/rHpQK[13].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's described at URL is recorded as https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2007/2007-52183.html[14].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's described at URL is recorded as https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/almID/1202503603295/[15].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's published in is recorded as Justia[16].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's judge is recorded as Rolando Acosta[17].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's plaintiff is recorded as Julius H. Schoeps[18].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's court is recorded as New York Supreme Court[19].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's copyright status is recorded as public domain[20].
- Schoeps v Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation's quotation or excerpt is recorded as This action was commenced by Julius H. Scheops, who claims to be an heir of Paul von [*2] Mendelssohn-Barthody ("Mendelssohn-Barthody"), for the restitution of Pablo Picasso's painting The Absinthe Drinker (Angel de Soto), oil on canvas, 69.5 x 55 cms., signed and dated 1903, and now valued at approximately 60 million dollars. The painting is currently owned by the Andrew Lloyd Webber Foundation. According to plaintiff, Mendelssohn-Barthody was a wealthy Berlin banker of Jewish decent who sold the painting to Justin K. Thannhouser, a Berlin art dealer, in Nazi Germany in a duress sale as a proximate and intended consequence of Nazi persecution.[21].