right to work
0 sources
right to work
Summary
right to work is an economic, social and cultural rights[1]. It draws 111 Wikipedia views per month (economic_social_and_cultural_rights category, ranking #2 of 9).[2]
Key Facts
- right to work's instance of is recorded as economic, social and cultural rights[3].
- right to work's GND ID is recorded as 4048739-8[4].
- right to work's Library of Congress authority ID is recorded as sh85114090[5].
- right to work's Bibliothèque nationale de France ID is recorded as 11974247g[6].
- right to work's part of is recorded as labor law[7].
- right to work's part of is recorded as union busting[8].
- right to work's MeSH descriptor ID is recorded as D000081202[9].
- right to work's BNCF Thesaurus ID is recorded as 15391[10].
- right to work's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/03gq32x[11].
- right to work's MeSH tree code is recorded as I01.880.604.473.694[12].
- right to work's MeSH tree code is recorded as N03.706.437.694[13].
- right to work's NL CR AUT ID is recorded as ph903830[14].
- right to work's participant is recorded as scab[15].
- right to work's has cause is recorded as corporate propaganda[16].
- right to work's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Right to work[17].
- right to work's Dewey Decimal Classification is recorded as 331.8892[18].
- right to work's Library of Congress Classification is recorded as HD4903-HD4903.5[19].
- right to work's described by source is recorded as Granat Encyclopedic Dictionary[20].
- right to work's described by source is recorded as Universal Declaration of Human Rights[21].
- right to work's has characteristic is recorded as union busting[22].
- right to work's UMLS CUI is recorded as C5197801[23].
- right to work's Quora topic ID is recorded as Right-to-Work[24].
- right to work's has goal is recorded as union busting[25].
- right to work's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as right-to-work[26].
- right to work's UNESCO Thesaurus ID is recorded as concept7698[27].
Why It Matters
right to work draws 111 Wikipedia views per month (economic_social_and_cultural_rights category, ranking #2 of 9).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 15 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[28] It is known by 10 alternative names across languages and contexts.[29]