Home › Entities › request_for_comments › RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies

RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies

request for comments publication
Place request_for_comments Q47470440
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies

Summary

RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies is a Request for Comments[1].

Key Facts

  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's instance of is recorded as Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[2].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's publisher is recorded as Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies — publisher (P123): Internet Engineering Task Force[3].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's DOI is recorded as 10.17487/RFC1919[4].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's language of work or name is recorded as Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies — language of work or name (P407): English[5].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's publication date is recorded as +1996-03-01T00:00:00Z[6].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's RfC ID is recorded as 1919[7].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1919[8].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1919.txt[9].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1919.txt[10].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc1919.txt.pdf[11].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's number of pages is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+35'}[12].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's title is recorded as Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies[13].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's author name string is recorded as M. Chatel[14].
  • RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's DBLP publication ID is recorded as journals/rfc/rfc1919[15].

Body

Designation and Status

RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies's instance of is recorded as Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  2. [3] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  3. [4] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  9. [10] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  10. [11] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  11. [12] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  12. [13] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  13. [14] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  14. [15] ↑ . DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02. Retrieved . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies. Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies
MLA “RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): RFC 1919: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies — https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1919-classical-versus-transparent-ip-proxies · Last refreshed: