Home › Entities › request_for_comments › RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)

RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)

request for comments publication
Place request_for_comments Q47168866
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)

Summary

RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) is a Request for Comments[1].

Key Facts

  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) authored Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — author (P50): Steve Crocker[2].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) authored Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — author (P50): Eliot Lear[3].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s instance of is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[4].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s publisher is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — publisher (P123): Internet Engineering Task Force[5].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s DOI is recorded as 10.17487/RFC1627[6].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s language of work or name is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — language of work or name (P407): English[7].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s publication date is recorded as +1994-07-01T00:00:00Z[8].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s RfC ID is recorded as 1627[9].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1627[10].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1627.txt[11].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1627.txt[12].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc1627.txt.pdf[13].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s number of pages is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+8'}[14].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s replaced by is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — replaced by (P1366): RFC 1918: Address Allocation for Private Internets[15].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s title is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)[16].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s author name string is recorded as E. Fair[17].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s author name string is recorded as T. Kessler[18].
  • RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s DBLP publication ID is recorded as journals/rfc/rfc1627[19].

Body

Designation and Status

RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)'s instance of is recorded as Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[4].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [4] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  2. [2] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  3. [3] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  9. [10] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  10. [11] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  11. [12] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  12. [13] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  13. [14] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  14. [15] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  15. [16] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  16. [17] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  17. [18] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  18. [19] ↑ . DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02. Retrieved . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified). Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified-
MLA “RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified).” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified-.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified-_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified)}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified-}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): RFC 1627: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be Codified) — https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified- (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-1627-network-10-considered-harmful-some-practices-shouldn-t-be-codified- · Last refreshed: