Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored

scientific article published on April 30, 2013
Place scholarly_letter_reply Q43174750
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Key Facts

  • Author: Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Malcolm A LeCompte[1], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Dale Batchelor[2], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Mark N Demitroff[3], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Charles Mooney[4], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Edward K Vogel[5], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Barrett N Rock[6], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Alfred W Seidel[7]
  • Instance of: Prior studies validating research are ignored — instance of (P31): scholarly article[8]
  • Page(s): E1652[9]
  • Language of work or name: Prior studies validating research are ignored — language of work or name (P407): English[10]
  • Issue: 18[11]
  • Volume: 110[12]
  • Publication date: April 1, 2013[13], April 30, 2013[14]
  • Main subject: Prior studies validating research are ignored — main subject (P921): Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[15]
  • Work available at URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/110/18/E1652.full.pdf[16], https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3645571[17], https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3645571?pdf=render[18], https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300425110[19], https://pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1300425110[20]
  • Number of pages: 1 page[21]
  • Published in: Prior studies validating research are ignored — published in (P1433): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America[22]
  • Title: Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored[23]
  • Reply to: Prior studies validating research are ignored — reply to (P2675): Faulty protocols yield contaminated samples, unconfirmed results[24]
  • Cites work: Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Faulty protocols yield contaminated samples, unconfirmed results[25], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Independent evaluation of conflicting microspherule results from different investigations of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[26], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Evidence for an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions and the Younger Dryas cooling[27], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): The Case for the Younger Dryas Extraterrestrial Impact Event: Mammoth, Megafauna, and Clovis Extinction, 12,900 Years Ago.[28], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): An independent evaluation of the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis[29]
  • Maintained by WikiProject: Prior studies validating research are ignored — maintained by WikiProject (P6104): WikiProject Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[30]

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [8] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  2. [1] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  3. [2] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  4. [3] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  5. [4] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  6. [5] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  7. [6] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  8. [7] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  9. [9] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  10. [10] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  11. [11] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  12. [12] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  13. [13] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  14. [14] ↑ . National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved . eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  15. [15] ↑ . Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis bibliography and paper archive. cosmictusk.com. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  16. [16] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  17. [17] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . ebi.ac.uk. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  18. [18] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . ebi.ac.uk. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  19. [19] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . ebi.ac.uk. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  20. [20] ↑ . Crossref. Retrieved . api.crossref.org. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  21. [21] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  22. [22] ↑ . Europe PubMed Central. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  23. [23] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  24. [24] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  25. [25] ↑ . PubMed Central. Retrieved . eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  26. [26] ↑ . PubMed Central. Retrieved . eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  27. [27] ↑ . PubMed Central. Retrieved . eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  28. [28] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  29. [29] ↑ . PubMed Central. Retrieved . eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  30. [30] ↑ . wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored. Retrieved October 16, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored
MLA “Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 16 Oct. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored}, note = {Accessed: 2026-10-16}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored — https://4ort.xyz/entity/reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored (retrieved 2026-10-16)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/reply-to-boslough-prior-studies-validating-research-are-ignored · Last refreshed:

Edit History

Rolling log of changes to this entity's Wikidata record. Values shown reflect the current state of each edited property — follow the history link to see the precise diff for any edit.

  1. 12w ago · InternetArchiveBot bot · 2026-07-26 view diff on Wikidata ↗
    Reply to → Faulty protocols yield contaminated samples, unconfirmed results
    Wikidata description → scientific article published on April 30, 2013
    Author → Malcolm A LeCompte, Dale Batchelor, Mark N Demitroff +4
    Main subject → Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
    + 17 other properties edited (see Wikidata diff for full list)
    "/* wbsetclaim-update-references:1||1|2 */ Main subject: Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, Rescuing 1 sources and submitting 0 for archiving. #IABot (v2.0.9.5)"
Live feed via Wikidata EventStreams. New edits appear within minutes of being made on Wikidata.