Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored
scientific article published on April 30, 2013
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Key Facts
- Author: Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Malcolm A LeCompte[1], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Dale Batchelor[2], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Mark N Demitroff[3], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Charles Mooney[4], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Edward K Vogel[5], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Barrett N Rock[6], Prior studies validating research are ignored — author (P50): Alfred W Seidel[7]
- Instance of: Prior studies validating research are ignored — instance of (P31): scholarly article[8]
- Page(s): E1652[9]
- Language of work or name: Prior studies validating research are ignored — language of work or name (P407): English[10]
- Issue: 18[11]
- Volume: 110[12]
- Publication date: April 1, 2013[13], April 30, 2013[14]
- Main subject: Prior studies validating research are ignored — main subject (P921): Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[15]
- Work available at URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/110/18/E1652.full.pdf[16], https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3645571[17], https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3645571?pdf=render[18], https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300425110[19], https://pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1300425110[20]
- Number of pages: 1 page[21]
- Published in: Prior studies validating research are ignored — published in (P1433): Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America[22]
- Title: Reply to Boslough: Prior studies validating research are ignored[23]
- Reply to: Prior studies validating research are ignored — reply to (P2675): Faulty protocols yield contaminated samples, unconfirmed results[24]
- Cites work: Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Faulty protocols yield contaminated samples, unconfirmed results[25], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Independent evaluation of conflicting microspherule results from different investigations of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[26], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): Evidence for an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions and the Younger Dryas cooling[27], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): The Case for the Younger Dryas Extraterrestrial Impact Event: Mammoth, Megafauna, and Clovis Extinction, 12,900 Years Ago.[28], Prior studies validating research are ignored — cites work (P2860): An independent evaluation of the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis[29]
- Maintained by WikiProject: Prior studies validating research are ignored — maintained by WikiProject (P6104): WikiProject Younger Dryas impact hypothesis[30]