Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread
0 sources
Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread
Summary
Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread is a blog post[1].
Key Facts
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread authored Jens Bemme[2].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's image is recorded as Saxorum.svg[3].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's instance of is recorded as blog post[4].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's copyright license is recorded as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International[5].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's language of work or name is recorded as German[6].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's publication date is recorded as +2022-03-09T00:00:00Z[7].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as blogging[8].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as saxorum.hypotheses.org[9].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as Hypothèses.org[10].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as metadata[11].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as Wikidata[12].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's main subject is recorded as Hardbloggingscientists.de[13].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's work available at URL is recorded as https://saxorum.hypotheses.org/6905[14].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's catalog is recorded as Regional bibliography of Saxony[15].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's published in is recorded as saxorum.hypotheses.org[16].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's title is recorded as Nachdenken – über gutes oder schlechtes Bloggen, aber kein Thread[17].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Archivalia[18].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Sources of cycling history @deHypotheses[19].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Own metadata for own blogposts – Bibliographies with open data and Wikidata[20].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as History fragments in descriptions of texts and in the metadata of a pedunculate oak in Dresden[21].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Baumnetze – Geschichte(n) sammeln, teilen, erforschen[22].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as “Places around you” – Saxonica und Landeskunde können helfen Abstand zu halten und Nähe zu gewinnen[23].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Call for blog posts for the multilingual knowledge of the near surroundings with ‚Nearby‘ queries[24].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Speculation: The Future of Citizen Science in Saxony[25].
- Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's cites work is recorded as Gespräch über Nachhaltigkeitsmoral – ein Streitstück[26].
Body
Authorship and Creation
Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread authored Jens Bemme[2].
Publication
Reflecting – on good or bad blogging, but no Thread's publication date is recorded as +2022-03-09T00:00:00Z[7]. Its language of work or name is recorded as German[6].
Subject and Themes
Main subjects include blogging[8], saxorum.hypotheses.org[9], Hypothèses.org[10], metadata[11], Wikidata[12], and Hardbloggingscientists.de[13].