Ratibida pinnata
0 sources
Ratibida pinnata
Summary
Ratibida pinnata is a taxon[1]. It ranks in the top 0.82% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (146 views/month, #1,599 of 195,241).[2]
Key Facts
- Ratibida pinnata's instance of is recorded as taxon[3].
- Ratibida pinnata is classified at the rank of species[4].
- Ratibida pinnata belongs to the parent taxon Ratibida[5].
- Under binomial nomenclature, Ratibida pinnata is Ratibida pinnata[6].
- Ratibida pinnata's Commons category is recorded as Ratibida pinnata[7].
- Ratibida pinnata's has basionym is recorded as Rudbeckia pinnata[8].
- Ratibida pinnata's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Ratibida pinnata[9].
- Ratibida pinnata's Commons gallery is recorded as Ratibida pinnata[10].
- Ratibida pinnata's GRIN URL is recorded as https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=70542[11].
- Ratibida pinnata's short name is recorded as {'lang': 'mul', 'text': 'R. pinnata'}[12].
- Ratibida pinnata is commonly known as {'lang': 'en', 'text': 'pinnate prairie coneflower'}[13].
- Ratibida pinnata is commonly known as {'lang': 'zh', 'text': '羽叶松果菊'}[14].
- Ratibida pinnata is commonly known as {'lang': 'zh', 'text': '羽叶草光菊'}[15].
- Ratibida pinnata's maintained by WikiProject is recorded as WikiProject Invasion Biology[16].
Body
Classification
Under binomial nomenclature, Ratibida pinnata is Ratibida pinnata[6]. It is classified at the rank of species[4]. It belongs to the parent taxon Ratibida[5]. Recorded taxon common name include {'lang': 'en', 'text': 'pinnate prairie coneflower'}[13], {'lang': 'zh', 'text': '羽叶松果菊'}[14], and {'lang': 'zh', 'text': '羽叶草光菊'}[15].
Identifiers
Ratibida pinnata's iNaturalist taxon ID is recorded as 85331[17]. Ratibida pinnata's NCBI taxonomy ID is recorded as 52294[18]. Ratibida pinnata's Encyclopedia of Life ID is recorded as 509712[19]. Ratibida pinnata's GBIF taxon ID is recorded as 3087184[20]. Ratibida pinnata's ITIS TSN is recorded as 38343[21].
Why It Matters
Ratibida pinnata ranks in the top 0.82% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (146 views/month, #1,599 of 195,241).[2] It is known by 4 alternative names across languages and contexts.[22]