Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images
Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images
Research article (Physica Medica, 2018) · cited 21× · AI/ML
Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images
Summary
Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/quantifying-the-performance-of-two-different-types-of-commercial-software-programs-for-3d-patient-dose-reconstruction-fo
MLA“Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/quantifying-the-performance-of-two-different-types-of-commercial-software-programs-for-3d-patient-dose-reconstruction-fo.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_quantifying-the-performance-of-two-different-types-of-commercial-software-programs-for-3d-patient-dose-reconstruction-fo_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/quantifying-the-performance-of-two-different-types-of-commercial-software-programs-for-3d-patient-dose-reconstruction-fo}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images — https://4ort.xyz/entity/quantifying-the-performance-of-two-different-types-of-commercial-software-programs-for-3d-patient-dose-reconstruction-fo (retrieved 2026-05-24)
