違憲判決

Summary

違憲判決 is a judgment^[1].

Key Facts

• 違憲判決 is in the country of Japan^[2].
• 違憲判決's instance of is recorded as judgment^[3].
• 違憲判決's instance of is recorded as unconstitutionality^[4].
• 違憲判決 is operated by Supreme Court of Japan^[5].
• 違憲判決 is a type of court decision^[6].
• 違憲判決 is part of constitutional litigation^[7].
• 違憲判決's language of work or name is recorded as Japanese^[8].
• 違憲判決 comprises Tochigi patricide case^[9].
• 違憲判決 comprises 薬局距離制限事件^[10].
• 違憲判決 comprises apportionment of seats^[11].
• 違憲判決 comprises 森林法共有林事件^[12].
• 違憲判決 comprises 郵便法事件^[13].
• 違憲判決 comprises 在外日本人選挙権訴訟^[14].
• 違憲判決 comprises 婚外子国籍訴訟^[15].
• 違憲判決 comprises 再婚禁止期間訴訟^[16].
• 違憲判決 comprises 高田事件 (法学)^[17].
• 違憲判決 comprises 第三者所有物没収事件^[18].
• 違憲判決 comprises Sunagawa separation of church and state lawsuit^[19].
• 違憲判決 comprises Confucian temple case^[20].
• 違憲判決 comprises 愛媛県靖国神社玉串料訴訟^[21].
• 違憲判決 comprises 婚外子相続差別訴訟^[22].
• 違憲判決's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Japan^[23].
• 違憲判決's subject has role is recorded as constitutional review^[24].

Body

Definition and Type

Recorded instance of include judgment^[3] and unconstitutionality^[4]. 違憲判決 is a type of court decision^[6].

Use and Application

Components include Tochigi patricide case^[9], a felony^[25], in Japan^[26]; 薬局距離制限事件^[10], in Japan^[27]; apportionment of seats^[11], a distribution^[28]; 森林法共有林事件^[12], a case law^[29], in Japan^[30]; 郵便法事件^[13], in Japan^[31]; and 在外日本人選挙権訴訟^[14]. 違憲判決 is part of constitutional litigation^[7].