違憲判決

Summary

違憲判決 is a judgment^[1].

Key Facts

• 違憲判決 is in the country of Japan^[2].
• 違憲判決's instance of is recorded as judgment^[3].
• 違憲判決's instance of is recorded as unconstitutionality^[4].
• 違憲判決 is operated by Supreme Court of Japan^[5].
• 違憲判決 is a type of court decision^[6].
• 違憲判決 is part of constitutional litigation^[7].
• 違憲判決's language of work or name is recorded as Japanese^[8].
• 違憲判決 comprises Tochigi patricide case^[9].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q11622399^[10].
• 違憲判決 comprises apportionment of seats^[11].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q55521402^[12].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q55524673^[13].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q11423935^[14].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q11421332^[15].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q55524320^[16].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q11672042^[17].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q55523374^[18].
• 違憲判決 comprises Sunagawa separation of church and state lawsuit^[19].
• 違憲判決 comprises Confucian temple case^[20].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q11493790^[21].
• 違憲判決 comprises Q111426977^[22].
• 違憲判決's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Japan^[23].
• 違憲判決's subject has role is recorded as constitutional review^[24].

Body

Definition and Type

Recorded instance of include judgment^[3] and unconstitutionality^[4]. 違憲判決 is a type of court decision^[6].

Use and Application

Components include Tochigi patricide case^[9], a felony^[25], in Japan^[26]; Q11622399^[10], in Japan^[27]; apportionment of seats^[11], a distribution^[28]; Q55521402^[12], a case law^[29], in Japan^[30]; Q55524673^[13], in Japan^[31]; and Q11423935^[14]. 違憲判決 is part of constitutional litigation^[7].