Penrose–Lucas argument
Claim that human mathematicians are not describable as formal proof systems
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Penrose–Lucas argument
Summary
Penrose–Lucas argument is a philosophical argument[1]. It draws 49 Wikipedia views per month (philosophical_argument category, ranking #6 of 5).[2]
Key Facts
- Penrose–Lucas argument's instance of is recorded as philosophical argument[3].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's Google Knowledge Graph ID is recorded as /g/11d_w5w39v[4].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ID is recorded as lp-argue[5].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's theorized by is recorded as Emil Leon Post[6].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's theorized by is recorded as Alan Turing[7].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's theorized by is recorded as John Lucas[8].
- Penrose–Lucas argument's theorized by is recorded as Roger Penrose[9].
Why It Matters
Penrose–Lucas argument draws 49 Wikipedia views per month (philosophical_argument category, ranking #6 of 5).[2]