Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Research article (Revista Brasileira de Cartografia, 2020) · cited 17× · AI/ML
Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Summary
Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/landslide-scars-detection-using-remote-sensing-and-pattern-recognition-techniques-comparison-among-artificial-neural-net
MLA“Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/landslide-scars-detection-using-remote-sensing-and-pattern-recognition-techniques-comparison-among-artificial-neural-net.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_landslide-scars-detection-using-remote-sensing-and-pattern-recognition-techniques-comparison-among-artificial-neural-net_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/landslide-scars-detection-using-remote-sensing-and-pattern-recognition-techniques-comparison-among-artificial-neural-net}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Landslide Scars Detection using Remote Sensing and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Comparison Among Artificial Neural Networks, Gaussian Maximum Likelihood, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers — https://4ort.xyz/entity/landslide-scars-detection-using-remote-sensing-and-pattern-recognition-techniques-comparison-among-artificial-neural-net (retrieved 2026-05-24)