just-world fallacy

Summary

just-world fallacy is a hypothesis^[1]. It ranks in the top 9% of hypothesis entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (662 views/month).^[2]

Key Facts

• just-world fallacy's instance of is recorded as hypothesis^[3].
• just-world fallacy's instance of is recorded as cognitive bias^[4].
• just-world fallacy's part of is recorded as psychological terminology^[5].
• just-world fallacy's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/03hn4y^[6].
• just-world fallacy's Quora topic ID is recorded as Just-world-Hypothesis^[7].
• just-world fallacy's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 37544881^[8].
• just-world fallacy's RationalWiki ID is recorded as Just_world_hypothesis^[9].
• just-world fallacy's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C37544881^[10].
• just-world fallacy's Encyclopedia of China is recorded as 39339^[11].

Body

Geography

just-world fallacy's part of is recorded as psychological terminology^[5].

Designation and Status

Recorded instance of include hypothesis^[3] and cognitive bias^[4].

Why It Matters

just-world fallacy ranks in the top 9% of hypothesis entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (662 views/month).^[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 22 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[12] It is known by 11 alternative names across languages and contexts.^[13]