human reproduction
0 sources
human reproduction
Summary
human reproduction ranks in the top 1% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1,370 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- human reproduction's subclass of is recorded as sexual reproduction[2].
- human reproduction's subclass of is recorded as animal reproduction[3].
- human reproduction's Commons category is recorded as Human reproduction[4].
- human reproduction's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0410ws4[5].
- human reproduction's NL CR AUT ID is recorded as ph135019[6].
- human reproduction's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Human reproduction[7].
- human reproduction's U.S. National Archives Identifier is recorded as 10643668[8].
- human reproduction's partially coincident with is recorded as starting a family[9].
- human reproduction's BBC Things ID is recorded as 584691e9-3407-488b-bf82-8163072d6401[10].
- human reproduction's Quora topic ID is recorded as Human-Reproduction[11].
- human reproduction's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as human-reproduction[12].
- human reproduction's Open Library subject ID is recorded as human_reproduction[13].
- human reproduction's UNESCO Thesaurus ID is recorded as concept4111[14].
- human reproduction's schematic is recorded as Biological Life Cycle of Humans.svg[15].
- human reproduction's schematic is recorded as Biological life cycle of humans.svg[16].
- human reproduction's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 135964268[17].
- human reproduction's Krugosvet article is recorded as biologiya/reprodukciya-cheloveka[18].
- human reproduction's FactGrid item ID is recorded as Veikko Karvonen[19].
- human reproduction's KBpedia ID is recorded as HumanReproduction[20].
- human reproduction's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C135964268[21].
- human reproduction's Vikidia article ID is recorded as fr:Reproduction_humaine[22].
- human reproduction's characteristic of is recorded as human[23].
Why It Matters
human reproduction ranks in the top 1% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1,370 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 15 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[24] It is known by 7 alternative names across languages and contexts.[25]