historical criticism
0 sources
historical criticism
Summary
historical criticism ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (223 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- historical criticism's GND ID is recorded as 4160007-1[2].
- historical criticism's subclass of is recorded as literary criticism[3].
- historical criticism's subclass of is recorded as historiography[4].
- historical criticism's subclass of is recorded as biblical criticism[5].
- historical criticism's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/03kpf[6].
- historical criticism's NL CR AUT ID is recorded as ph138434[7].
- historical criticism's Library of Congress Classification is recorded as PN98.H57[8].
- historical criticism's described by source is recorded as Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation (2007 ed.)[9].
- historical criticism's described by source is recorded as Oxford Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation (2013 ed.)[10].
- historical criticism's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/historical-criticism-literary-criticism[11].
- historical criticism's Google Knowledge Graph ID is recorded as /g/1236my7r[12].
- historical criticism's Catholic Encyclopedia ID is recorded as 04503a[13].
- historical criticism's Quora topic ID is recorded as Historical-Criticism[14].
- historical criticism's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as higher-criticism[15].
- historical criticism's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 111633790[16].
- historical criticism's McClintock and Strong Biblical Cyclopedia ID is recorded as C/criticism-the-higher[17].
- historical criticism's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C111633790[18].
Why It Matters
historical criticism ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (223 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 17 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[19] It is known by 49 alternative names across languages and contexts.[20]