Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Summary

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a legal case^[1]. It ranks in the top 3% of legal_case entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (202 views/month).^[2]

Key Facts

• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is in the country of United States^[3].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's instance of is recorded as legal case^[4].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's instance of is recorded as decision of the Supreme Court of the United States^[5].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's has part is recorded as majority opinion^[6].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's publication date is recorded as +2006-06-29T00:00:00Z^[7].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/06_y4n^[8].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's significant event is recorded as oral argument^[9].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as United States^[10].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's legal citation of this text is recorded as 548 U.S. 557^[11].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's legal citation of this text is recorded as 126 S. Ct. 2749^[12].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's legal citation of this text is recorded as 165 L. Ed. 2d 723^[13].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's legal citation of this text is recorded as 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185^[14].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's legal citation of this text is recorded as 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 452^[15].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/Hamdan-v-Rumsfeld^[16].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's published in is recorded as United States Reports^[17].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's defendant is recorded as Donald Rumsfeld^[18].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's plaintiff is recorded as Salim Hamdan^[19].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's laws applied is recorded as United States Constitution^[20].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's laws applied is recorded as Geneva Conventions^[21].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's laws applied is recorded as Uniform Code of Military Justice^[22].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's laws applied is recorded as Detainee Treatment Act^[23].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's laws applied is recorded as Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists^[24].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's court is recorded as Supreme Court of the United States^[25].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as WikiProject Human rights^[26].
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld's majority opinion by is recorded as John Paul Stevens^[27].

Why It Matters

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ranks in the top 3% of legal_case entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (202 views/month).^[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 5 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[28]