Gender incongruence ruling
landmark decision by the Federal Social Court on the assumption of costs for the treatment of psychological distress caused by gender incongruence
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Gender incongruence ruling
Summary
Gender incongruence ruling is a decision of the Federal Social Court[1].
Key Facts
- Gender incongruence ruling authored Rainer Schlegel[2].
- Gender incongruence ruling authored Martin Estelmann[3].
- Gender incongruence ruling authored Bernhard Joachim Scholz[4].
- Gender incongruence ruling is in the country of Germany[5].
- Gender incongruence ruling's instance of is recorded as decision of the Federal Social Court[6].
- Gender incongruence ruling's instance of is recorded as judgment[7].
- Gender incongruence ruling's language of work or name is recorded as German[8].
- +2023-10-19T00:00:00Z marks the founding of Gender incongruence ruling[9].
- Gender incongruence ruling's publication date is recorded as +2023-10-19T00:00:00Z[10].
- Gender incongruence ruling's Internet Archive ID is recorded as b-01-kr-16-22-r[11].
- Gender incongruence ruling's main subject is recorded as gender incongruence[12].
- Gender incongruence ruling's main subject is recorded as gender dysphoria[13].
- Gender incongruence ruling's main subject is recorded as health insurance[14].
- Gender incongruence ruling's main subject is recorded as gender-affirmative care[15].
- Gender incongruence ruling's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.bsg.bund.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2023/2023_10_19_B_01_KR_16_22_R.html[16].
- Gender incongruence ruling's described at URL is recorded as https://doi.org/10.13154/294-12355[17].
- Gender incongruence ruling's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Germany[18].
- Gender incongruence ruling's legal citation of this text is recorded as BSG Urteil vom 19.10.2023, B 1 KR 16/22 R[19].
- Gender incongruence ruling's title is recorded as Krankenversicherung - Diagnose und Behandlung eines durch Geschlechtsinkongruenz verursachten Leidensdrucks mittels körpermodifizierender Maßnahmen - neue Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethode - Verbot mit Erlaubnisvorbehalt[20].
- Gender incongruence ruling's defendant is recorded as Techniker Krankenkasse[21].
- Gender incongruence ruling's plaintiff is recorded as insured person[22].
- Gender incongruence ruling's European Case Law ID is recorded as ECLI:DE:BSG:2023:191023UB1KR1622R0[23].
- Gender incongruence ruling's court is recorded as Federal Social Court[24].
- Gender incongruence ruling's Federal Legal Information ID is recorded as case-law/KSRE134580201[25].
Body
Works and Contributions
Authored works include Rainer Schlegel[2], a judge[26], b. 1958[27], of Germany[28]; Martin Estelmann[3], a judge[29], b. 1961[30], of Germany[31]; and Bernhard Joachim Scholz[4], a judge[32], b. 1969[33].