functional illiteracy
reading and writing skills that are inadequate "to manage daily living and employment tasks that require reading skills beyond a basic level."
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
functional illiteracy
Summary
functional illiteracy ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (379 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- functional illiteracy's GND ID is recorded as 4155672-0[2].
- functional illiteracy's subclass of is recorded as ignorance[3].
- functional illiteracy's opposite of is recorded as functional literacy[4].
- functional illiteracy's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/04ml7b[5].
- functional illiteracy's National Library of Spain SpMaBN ID is recorded as XX549586[6].
- functional illiteracy's Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana ID is recorded as 0281435[7].
- functional illiteracy's National Library of Latvia ID is recorded as 000321890[8].
- functional illiteracy's different from is recorded as illiteracy[9].
- functional illiteracy's UMLS CUI is recorded as C0020899[10].
- functional illiteracy's Encyclopædia Universalis ID is recorded as illettrisme[11].
- functional illiteracy's NE.se ID is recorded as funktionell-analfabetism[12].
- functional illiteracy's Quora topic ID is recorded as Functional-Illiteracy[13].
- functional illiteracy's UNESCO Thesaurus ID is recorded as concept11264[14].
- functional illiteracy's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 165205368[15].
- functional illiteracy's Australian Educational Vocabulary ID is recorded as scot/10707[16].
- functional illiteracy's France 24 topic ID is recorded as illétrisme[17].
- functional illiteracy's Encyclopedia of China is recorded as 204395[18].
- functional illiteracy's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C165205368[19].
- functional illiteracy's Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana ID is recorded as analfabetisme-funcional[20].
- functional illiteracy's Vikidia article ID is recorded as fr:Illettrisme[21].
Why It Matters
functional illiteracy ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (379 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 18 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[22] It is known by 12 alternative names across languages and contexts.[23]