Fraser Institute
Facts
22 properties- Instance of
- think tank, nonprofit organization[5]
- Field of work
- economic policy[1]
- Notable work
- Tax Freedom Day[2]
- Inception
- 1974[9]
- Founder
- Michael Walker[6]
- Official website
- www.fraserinstitute.org[10]
- Donations
- 2.8M (1.7M–5.7M, n=22)
- Funder
- Peter Munk
- Interested in
- privatization
- Legal form
- 501(c)(3) organization[31]
- Member of
- Atlas Network[3]
- Named after
- Fraser River[7]
- Organisation tax status
- charitable organization in Canada
- Political ideology
- libertarianism, conservatism, right-libertarianism, conservatism in Canada[27][28][29][30]
- Significant person
- Antony Fisher, Sally C Pipes
- Social media followers
- 35k (17k–35k, n=10)
- Sponsor
- ExxonMobil, Koch, Inc.[11][12]
- ROR ID
- 03455j977
- ISNI
- 0000000404769466
- VIAF cluster ID
- 125449046
- GND ID
- 1092104658
- OpenAlex ID
- I220249241
- GRID ID
- grid.468605.9
- CRA program account number
- 119233823RR0001
- Canadian Encyclopedia article ID
- fraser-institute
- CiNii Research ID
- 1981149384721853833
- DeSmog ID
- fraser-institute
- Domain name
- fraserinstitute.org
- Facebook username
- FraserInstitute
Show all 31 identifiers +19
- Freebase ID
- /m/02pc8_
- Google News topics ID
- CAAqJggKIiBDQkFTRWdvSkwyMHZNREp3WXpoZkVnVmxiaTFIUWlnQVAB
- IRS Employer Identification Number
- 98-0032427
- InfluenceWatch ID
- non-profit/fraser-institute
- Instagram username
- fraser_institute
- JSTOR publisher ID
- fraserinstit
- LinkedIn company or organization ID
- the-fraser-institute
- LittleSis organization ID
- 89507
- Media Bias/Fact Check ID
- fraser-institute
- Microsoft Academic ID (discontinued)
- 220249241
- NACSIS-CAT author ID
- DA02868624
- NLA Trove people ID
- 1204658
- National Library of Israel J9U ID
- 987007261368505171
- Open Funder Registry funder ID
- 501100003184
- Quora topic ID
- Fraser-Institute, The-Fraser-Institute
- Ringgold ID
- 8148
- Scilit organization ID
- 59045
- X (Twitter) username
- fraserinstitute
- YouTube channel ID
- UCf5Ow5haYUhnADeYTzdsF-g
From open datasets, joined by identifier and shown only for properties Wikidata does not state on this entity — except where the dataset is the registry authority for the fact (ClinicalTrials.gov on trial registration data): there its value is shown instead, with Wikidata's noted beside it. Every row carries its dataset edition and licence.
where from?
- Source
- isni_public
- Edition
- 20261001 · as of 2026-10-01
- Licence
- CC0 1.0
- Credit
- ISNI International Agency (isni.org), CC0 1.0 — no attribution required, credited by choice
- Bronze
- manifest sha256
56776a77b0fa0416… - Transform
- 4ort-mint · lake · version not recorded
← Affiliated with 5
Political ideology 3
Created notable works 2
Instance of 2
Sponsor 2
Country 1
Edited works 1
Field of work 1
Founder 1
Funder 1
Headquarters location 1
Interested in 1
Legal form 1
Member of 1
Named after 1
Notable work 1
Significant person 1
← Affiliation 1
0 sources
high ≥ 0.90 · emerging ≥ 0.65 · low below — calibrated against hand-rated truth (single-source .44 · two-source .62 · production-typical .70), so a band is a measurement, not a promise. High is rare by design: it needs both a supported assertion and an evidence sentence. A confirmed or contradicted chip is a Wikidata cross-check; no chip means Wikidata has no value for that property — the ordinary case here, and it says nothing either way. A confirm-only note marks a property whose check can never disagree (Wikidata's border and capital data is not exhaustive), so silence there is a limit of the check, not of the claim.
served-tier precision 80.7% [76.2, 84.5] · rated rows currently served n=342 · entailment-gated at 0.85 · measured 2026-09-29 · re-scored every 10 min, demoted at the half-hourly fold
evidence “The libertarian Fraser Institute in Vancouver likewise ranked Canada No.” fortune.com · read source
Show 1 low-confidence claim
Published, not hidden — scoring low is not a reason to withhold a sourced claim. A contradicted chip means Wikidata holds a different value; both are shown so you can judge.
evidence “"Canadian retaliation will lead to higher costs for our firms and consumers, put additional strain on integrated North American supply chains, and slow overall economic growth on our side of the border," agree Jock Finlayson and Steven Globerman of Canada's Fraser Institute.” reason.com · read source