Fauna Japonica

Summary

Fauna Japonica is a written work^[1]. It ranks in the top 8% of written_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (15 views/month).^[2]

Key Facts

• Fauna Japonica's image is recorded as Fauna Japonica.jpg^[3].
• Fauna Japonica's instance of is recorded as written work^[4].
• Fauna Japonica's editor is recorded as Philipp Franz von Siebold^[5].
• Fauna Japonica's place of publication is recorded as Leiden^[6].
• Fauna Japonica's Commons category is recorded as Fauna Japonica^[7].
• Fauna Japonica's has part is recorded as Fauna Japonica. Crustacea^[8].
• Fauna Japonica's has part is recorded as Fauna Japonica. Pisces^[9].
• Fauna Japonica's has part is recorded as Fauna Japonica. Reptilia^[10].
• Fauna Japonica's has part is recorded as Fauna Japonica. Aves^[11].
• Fauna Japonica's has part is recorded as Fauna Japonica. Mammalia^[12].
• Fauna Japonica's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/03nx8tj^[13].
• Fauna Japonica's main subject is recorded as fauna^[14].
• Fauna Japonica's described by source is recorded as 3. On the Dates of the Parts of Siebold's ‘Fauna Japonica’ and Giebel's ‘Allgemeine Zoologie’ (first edition)^[15].
• Fauna Japonica's described by source is recorded as L. B. HOLTHUIS and T. SAKAI. Ph. F. von Siebold and Fauna Japonica – A history of early Japanese zoology. Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo, 1970. Quarto, 323 pp., 33 coloured plates, 5 black-and-white plates, 1 map. Price Yen 15,000.^[16].
• Fauna Japonica's title is recorded as {'lang': 'la', 'text': 'Fauna Japonica sive Descriptio animalium, quae in itinere per Japoniam, jussu et auspiciis superiorum, qui summum in India Batava imperium tenent, suscepto, annis 1823–1830 collegit, notis, observationibus et adumbrationibus illustravit Ph. Fr. de Siebold'}^[17].
• Fauna Japonica's BHL bibliography ID is recorded as 124951^[18].

Body

Designation and Status

Fauna Japonica's instance of is recorded as written work^[4].

Why It Matters

Fauna Japonica ranks in the top 8% of written_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (15 views/month).^[2]