Home › Entities › doctoral_thesis › Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study

Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study

2018 doctoral thesis by Samantha Heath at Massey University
Place doctoral_thesis Q112447163
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study

Summary

Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study is a doctoral thesis[1].

Key Facts

  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study authored a mixed methods study — author (P50): Samantha Heath[2].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's instance of is recorded as a mixed methods study — instance of (P31): doctoral thesis[3].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's publisher is recorded as a mixed methods study — publisher (P123): Massey Research Online[4].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's language of work or name is recorded as a mixed methods study — language of work or name (P407): English[5].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's country of origin is recorded as a mixed methods study — country of origin (P495): New Zealand[6].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's publication date is recorded as +2018-00-00T00:00:00Z[7].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): New Zealand[8].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): education[9].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): career development[10].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): nurse[11].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): attitude[12].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): case study[13].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's main subject is recorded as a mixed methods study — main subject (P921): nurse practitioner[14].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's Handle ID is recorded as 10179/14652[15].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's title is recorded as Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study[16].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's copyright holder is recorded as a mixed methods study — copyright holder (P3931): Samantha Heath[17].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's thesis submitted to is recorded as a mixed methods study — thesis submitted to (P4101): Massey University[18].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as a mixed methods study — on focus list of Wikimedia project (P5008): NZThesisProject[19].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's copyright status is recorded as a mixed methods study — copyright status (P6216): copyrighted[20].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's thesis committee member is recorded as a mixed methods study — thesis committee member (P9161): Helen Southwood[21].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's thesis committee member is recorded as a mixed methods study — thesis committee member (P9161): Bobbie Hunter[22].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's thesis committee member is recorded as a mixed methods study — thesis committee member (P9161): Sally A Clendon[23].
  • Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's thesis committee member is recorded as a mixed methods study — thesis committee member (P9161): Mark Jones[24].

Body

Designation and Status

Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study's instance of is recorded as a mixed methods study — instance of (P31): doctoral thesis[3].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [3] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  2. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  3. [4] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  9. [10] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  10. [11] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  11. [12] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  12. [13] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  13. [14] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  14. [15] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  15. [16] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  16. [17] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  17. [18] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  18. [19] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  19. [20] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  20. [21] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  21. [22] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  22. [23] ↑ . hdl.handle.net. hdl.handle.net. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  23. [24] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study. Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study
MLA “Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Explaining nurses' decisions to participate in a Professional Development and Recognition Programme : a mixed methods study — https://4ort.xyz/entity/explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/explaining-nurses-decisions-to-participate-in-a-professional-development-and-recognition-programme-a-mixed-methods-study · Last refreshed: