critical discourse analysis

Summary

critical discourse analysis ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (375 views/month).^[1]

Key Facts

• critical discourse analysis's Library of Congress authority ID is recorded as sh00009792^[2].
• critical discourse analysis's subclass of is recorded as discourse analysis^[3].
• critical discourse analysis's Commons category is recorded as Critical discourse analysis^[4].
• critical discourse analysis's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/027z31^[5].
• critical discourse analysis's NL CR AUT ID is recorded as ph996423^[6].
• critical discourse analysis's FAST ID is recorded as 883664^[7].
• critical discourse analysis's Quora topic ID is recorded as Critical-Discourse-Analysis^[8].
• critical discourse analysis's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as critical-discourse-analysis^[9].
• critical discourse analysis's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 2779030433^[10].
• critical discourse analysis's National Library of Israel J9U ID is recorded as 987007291822105171^[11].
• critical discourse analysis's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C2779030433^[12].
• critical discourse analysis's Yale LUX ID is recorded as concept/59f9889e-68fd-46de-86d5-7ef98fb7d668^[13].

Why It Matters

critical discourse analysis ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (375 views/month).^[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 16 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[14] It is known by 13 alternative names across languages and contexts.^[15]