cost-effectiveness analysis
0 sources
cost-effectiveness analysis
Summary
cost-effectiveness analysis ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (52 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- cost-effectiveness analysis's Library of Congress authority ID is recorded as sh99004945[2].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's subclass of is recorded as economics[3].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's MeSH descriptor ID is recorded as D000094703[4].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/01n8zs[5].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's MeSH tree code is recorded as N03.219.151.285[6].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's Art & Architecture Thesaurus ID is recorded as 300387674[7].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's NALT ID is recorded as 29562[8].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's UMLS CUI is recorded as C0010181[9].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as cost-effectiveness-analysis[10].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's STW Thesaurus for Economics ID is recorded as 11530-2[11].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's UNESCO Thesaurus ID is recorded as concept2206[12].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's EuroVoc ID is recorded as 1721[13].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 515549039[14].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's National Library of Israel J9U ID is recorded as 987007539594705171[15].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C515549039[16].
- cost-effectiveness analysis's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C3019080777[17].
Why It Matters
cost-effectiveness analysis ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (52 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 17 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[18] It is known by 9 alternative names across languages and contexts.[19]