Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
Research article (Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021) · cited 18× · AI/ML
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
Summary
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-between-conventional-and-compressed-sensing-cine-cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance-for-feature-tracking-globa
MLA“Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-between-conventional-and-compressed-sensing-cine-cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance-for-feature-tracking-globa.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-between-conventional-and-compressed-sensing-cine-cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance-for-feature-tracking-globa_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-between-conventional-and-compressed-sensing-cine-cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance-for-feature-tracking-globa}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-between-conventional-and-compressed-sensing-cine-cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance-for-feature-tracking-globa (retrieved 2026-05-24)
