Cercis chinensis
0 sources
Cercis chinensis
Summary
Cercis chinensis is a taxon[1]. It ranks in the top 0.78% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (114 views/month, #1,517 of 195,241).[2]
Key Facts
- Cercis chinensis's image is recorded as CercisChinensisShrub2.jpg[3].
- Cercis chinensis's instance of is recorded as taxon[4].
- Cercis chinensis's taxon rank is recorded as species[5].
- Cercis chinensis's IUCN conservation status is recorded as Least Concern[6].
- Cercis chinensis's parent taxon is recorded as Cercis[7].
- Cercis chinensis's taxon name is recorded as Cercis chinensis[8].
- Cercis chinensis's has use is recorded as afforestation[9].
- Cercis chinensis's has use is recorded as medicinal plant[10].
- Cercis chinensis's Commons category is recorded as Cercis chinensis[11].
- Cercis chinensis's IUCN taxon ID is recorded as 19893034[12].
- Cercis chinensis's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0gg5265[13].
- Cercis chinensis's UNII is recorded as 29L2560D7T[14].
- Cercis chinensis's NCBI taxonomy ID is recorded as 161750[15].
- Cercis chinensis's Encyclopedia of Life ID is recorded as 643987[16].
- Cercis chinensis's GBIF taxon ID is recorded as 5353599[17].
- Cercis chinensis's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Cercis chinensis[18].
- Cercis chinensis's Commons gallery is recorded as Cercis chinensis[19].
- Cercis chinensis's Tropicos ID is recorded as 13028558[20].
- Cercis chinensis's IPNI plant ID is recorded as 485670-1[21].
- Cercis chinensis's Plant List ID is recorded as ild-32953[22].
- Cercis chinensis's described by source is recorded as Gujin Tushu Jicheng[23].
- Cercis chinensis's described by source is recorded as Gujin Tushu Jicheng[24].
- Cercis chinensis's described by source is recorded as Zhiwu Mingshi Tukao[25].
- Cercis chinensis's described by source is recorded as Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, volume 39[26].
- Cercis chinensis's GRIN URL is recorded as https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=9943[27].
Why It Matters
Cercis chinensis ranks in the top 0.78% of taxon entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (114 views/month, #1,517 of 195,241).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 10 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[28] It is known by 6 alternative names across languages and contexts.[29]