Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.

Summary

Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. is a copyright legal case^[1]. Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. draws 49 Wikipedia views per month (copyright_legal_case category, ranking #1 of 2).^[2]

Key Facts

• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s instance of is recorded as copyright legal case^[3].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s Commons category is recorded as Corel Professional Photos CD-ROM^[4].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s publication date is recorded as +1999-02-18T00:00:00Z^[5].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s Freebase ID is recorded as /m/03l0tg^[6].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s main subject is recorded as copyright infringement^[7].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s applies to jurisdiction is recorded as United States^[8].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s defendant is recorded as Alludo^[9].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s judge is recorded as Lewis A. Kaplan^[10].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s plaintiff is recorded as Bridgeman Art Library^[11].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s different from is recorded as National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute^[12].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s different from is recorded as Authors Guild v. Google^[13].
• Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'s court is recorded as United States District Court for the Southern District of New York^[14].

Why It Matters

Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. draws 49 Wikipedia views per month (copyright_legal_case category, ranking #1 of 2).^[2] Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. has Wikipedia articles in 10 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[15] Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. is known by 19 alternative names across languages and contexts.^[16]