Becky Freeman
Facts
9 properties- Instance of
- human
- Occupation
- researcher
- Employer
- University of Sydney[3]
- Field of work
- tobacco control[2]
- Educated at
- University of Alberta, University of Sydney[4][5]
- Doctoral student
- Lucy Hardie[7]
- On focus list of Wikimedia project
- NZThesisProject[9]
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0002-2082-9612
- Google Scholar author ID
- g-sDEu4AAAAJ
- The Conversation author ID
- 93
Affiliated with 1
0 sources
Summary
Becky Freeman has worked as a researcher[1].
FAQs
What did Becky Freeman do for work?
Becky Freeman worked as a researcher[1].
Where did Becky Freeman go to school?
Becky Freeman was educated at University of Alberta[4] and University of Sydney[5].
high ≥ 0.90 · emerging ≥ 0.65 · low below — calibrated against hand-rated truth (single-source .44 · two-source .62 · production-typical .70), so a band is a measurement, not a promise. High is rare by design: it needs both a supported assertion and an evidence sentence. A confirmed or contradicted chip is a Wikidata cross-check; no chip means Wikidata has no value for that property — the ordinary case here, and it says nothing either way. A confirm-only note marks a property whose check can never disagree (Wikidata's border and capital data is not exhaustive), so silence there is a limit of the check, not of the claim.
served-tier precision 80.7% [76.2, 84.5] · rated rows currently served n=342 · entailment-gated at 0.85 · measured 2026-09-29 · re-scored every 10 min, demoted at the half-hourly fold
Show 2 low-confidence claims
Published, not hidden — scoring low is not a reason to withhold a sourced claim. A contradicted chip means Wikidata holds a different value; both are shown so you can judge.
evidence “However, University of Sydney public health professor Becky Freeman says shrinking the excise risks creating a "race to the bottom with criminals", while also risking a spike in smoking rates.” muswellbrookchronicle.com.au · read source
evidence “University of Sydney public health professor Becky Freeman described the policy as a "terrible idea".” abc.net.au · read source