Home › Entities › academia › Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence

Research article (Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2020) · cited 60× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W3091232338
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence

Summary

Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or
MLA “Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence — https://4ort.xyz/entity/artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/artificial-intelligence-evaluating-primary-thoracic-lesions-has-an-overall-lower-error-rate-compared-to-veterinarians-or · Last refreshed: