Apollo Research

🛰️ Living Edge · news-derived, source-cited

high ≥ 0.90 · emerging ≥ 0.65 · low below — calibrated against hand-rated truth (single-source .44 · two-source .62 · production-typical .70), so a band is a measurement, not a promise. High is rare by design: it needs both a supported assertion and an evidence sentence. A confirmed or contradicted chip is a Wikidata cross-check; no chip means Wikidata has no value for that property — the ordinary case here, and it says nothing either way. A confirm-only note marks a property whose check can never disagree (Wikidata's border and capital data is not exhaustive), so silence there is a limit of the check, not of the claim.

served-tier precision 80.7% [76.2, 84.5] · rated rows currently served n=342 · entailment-gated at 0.85 · measured 2026-09-29 · re-scored every 10 min, demoted at the half-hourly fold

Show 4 low-confidence claims

Published, not hidden — scoring low is not a reason to withhold a sourced claim. A contradicted chip means Wikidata holds a different value; both are shown so you can judge.

partner 4ort OpenAI low0.612 independent sources

evidence “Last year, Apollo Research partnered with OpenAI in an effort to get its newest models to be more truthful, even under pressure.” theguardian.com · read source

Founder Hobbhahn low0.612 independent sources

evidence ““You have to be cynical,” Marius Hobbhahn, Apollo’s 29-year-old founder, told me.” theguardian.com · read source

Headquarters location London-based low0.612 independent sources

evidence “Last year, I visited the London offices of Apollo Research, the company whose research into deceptive AIs made waves in 2023.” theguardian.com · read source

Chief executive officer Marius Hobbhahn low0.612 independent sources

evidence “Marius Hobbhahn, chief executive of the AI safety organization Apollo Research, framed the structural question at the center of the summer's disclosures:” techtimes.com · read source