affirming the consequent
0 sources
affirming the consequent
Summary
affirming the consequent ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (397 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- affirming the consequent's subclass of is recorded as propositional fallacy[2].
- affirming the consequent's subclass of is recorded as quantificational fallacy[3].
- affirming the consequent's opposite of is recorded as denying the antecedent[4].
- affirming the consequent's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0hxy[5].
- affirming the consequent's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/affirming-the-consequent[6].
- affirming the consequent's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/affirmation-of-the-consequent[7].
- affirming the consequent's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 2777662235[8].
- affirming the consequent's ProofWiki ID is recorded as Affirming_the_Consequent[9].
- affirming the consequent's RationalWiki ID is recorded as Affirming_the_consequent[10].
- affirming the consequent's Encyclopaedia Herder concept ID is recorded as Afirmación_del_consecuente[11].
Why It Matters
affirming the consequent ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (397 views/month).[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 18 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[12] It is known by 17 alternative names across languages and contexts.[13]