Home › Entities › academia › A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Research article (IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2016) · cited 12× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W2416289432
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

An usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Summary

An usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • An usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?'s instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi
MLA “A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: Can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? — https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-usability-study-of-a-critical-manmachine-interface-can-layperson-responders-perform-optimal-compression-rates-when-usi · Last refreshed: