Home ›
Entities
› academia
› A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom
A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom
Research article (Medical Physics, 2019) · cited 18× · AI/ML
A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom
Summary
A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-fouralternative-forced-choice-4afc-methodology-for-evaluating-microcalcification-detection-in-clinical-fullfield-digit
MLA“A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-fouralternative-forced-choice-4afc-methodology-for-evaluating-microcalcification-detection-in-clinical-fullfield-digit.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_a-fouralternative-forced-choice-4afc-methodology-for-evaluating-microcalcification-detection-in-clinical-fullfield-digit_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-fouralternative-forced-choice-4afc-methodology-for-evaluating-microcalcification-detection-in-clinical-fullfield-digit}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): A four‐alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full‐field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet‐printed anthropomorphic phantom — https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-fouralternative-forced-choice-4afc-methodology-for-evaluating-microcalcification-detection-in-clinical-fullfield-digit (retrieved 2026-05-24)