2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack
0 sources
2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack
Summary
2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack is a mass shooting[1]. It draws 252 Wikipedia views per month (mass_shooting category, ranking #69 of 197).[2]
Key Facts
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack is in the country of Bangladesh[3].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's image is recorded as Dipto shopoth, gulshan.jpg[4].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's instance of is recorded as mass shooting[5].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's instance of is recorded as terrorist attack[6].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's instance of is recorded as hostage taking[7].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's location is recorded as Gulshan Thana[8].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's part of is recorded as Islamic terrorism[9].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's Commons category is recorded as 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack[10].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's armament is recorded as assault rifle[11].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's armament is recorded as pistol[12].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's armament is recorded as bomb[13].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's armament is recorded as sword[14].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's point in time is recorded as +2016-07-01T00:00:00Z[15].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's coordinate location is recorded as {'lat': 23.802511111111, 'lon': 90.416688888889}[16].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's number of deaths is recorded as {'amount': '+28'}[17].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's number of injured is recorded as {'amount': '+50'}[18].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's Google Knowledge Graph ID is recorded as /g/11b_2mxvt4[19].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's number of perpetrators is recorded as {'amount': '+5'}[20].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's perpetrator is recorded as Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh[21].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's perpetrator is recorded as Islamic State[22].
- 2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack's perpetrator is recorded as Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki[23].
Why It Matters
2016 Gulshan, Dhaka attack draws 252 Wikipedia views per month (mass_shooting category, ranking #69 of 197).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 18 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[24] It is known by 5 alternative names across languages and contexts.[25]