Working Group on Indigenous Populations
former United Nations working group
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Working Group on Indigenous Populations
Summary
Working Group on Indigenous Populations is a panel[1]. It draws 11 Wikipedia views per month (panel category, ranking #21 of 39).[2]
Key Facts
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's instance of is recorded as panel[3].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's instance of is recorded as governing body[4].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's followed by is recorded as Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples[5].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's VIAF cluster ID is recorded as 123316456[6].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's GND ID is recorded as 4415547-5[7].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's Library of Congress authority ID is recorded as n95102398[8].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/07tglf[9].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's parent organization or unit is recorded as United Nations[10].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's main subject is recorded as indigenous people[11].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/Working-Group-on-Indigenous-Populations[12].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as WikiProject Human rights[13].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's National Library of Israel J9U ID is recorded as 987007423289005171[14].
- Working Group on Indigenous Populations's Yale LUX ID is recorded as group/efa6bf90-bb97-4cbc-b6b0-fa64aea63e74[15].
Body
Identity
Working Group on Indigenous Populations's followed by is recorded as Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples[5].
Operations
Working Group on Indigenous Populations's parent organization or unit is recorded as United Nations[10].
Why It Matters
Working Group on Indigenous Populations draws 11 Wikipedia views per month (panel category, ranking #21 of 39).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 6 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[16] It is known by 9 alternative names across languages and contexts.[17]