two-source hypothesis

solution to the synoptic problem, stating that Matthew and Luke were based on Mark and a hypothetical sayings collection ("Q")
Place scientific_hypothesis Q233047
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

two-source hypothesis

Summary

two-source hypothesis is a scientific hypothesis[1]. It draws 139 Wikipedia views per month (scientific_hypothesis category, ranking #39 of 69).[2]

Key Facts

  • two-source hypothesis's image is recorded as Synoptic problem, two-source hypothesis.svg[3].
  • two-source hypothesis's instance of is recorded as scientific hypothesis[4].
  • two-source hypothesis's GND ID is recorded as 4191254-8[5].
  • two-source hypothesis's Library of Congress authority ID is recorded as sh85139059[6].
  • two-source hypothesis's Bibliothèque nationale de France ID is recorded as 133196244[7].
  • two-source hypothesis's Commons category is recorded as Two-source hypothesis[8].
  • two-source hypothesis's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/015l83[9].
  • two-source hypothesis's facet of is recorded as Synoptic problem[10].
  • two-source hypothesis's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/two-source-hypothesis[11].
  • two-source hypothesis's FAST ID is recorded as 1159882[12].
  • two-source hypothesis's derivative work is recorded as Four-document hypothesis[13].
  • two-source hypothesis's National Library of Israel J9U ID is recorded as 987007558417605171[14].
  • two-source hypothesis's Yale LUX ID is recorded as concept/40e4e6be-e681-440b-ad81-6aee14d43313[15].

Body

Designation and Status

two-source hypothesis's instance of is recorded as scientific hypothesis[4].

Why It Matters

two-source hypothesis draws 139 Wikipedia views per month (scientific_hypothesis category, ranking #39 of 69).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 13 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[16] It is known by 15 alternative names across languages and contexts.[17]

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [3] . wikidata.org.
  2. [4] . wikidata.org.
  3. [5] . Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  4. [6] . github.com. Retrieved . github.com. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  5. [7] . Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  6. [8] . wikidata.org.
  7. [9] . Freebase Data Dumps. wikidata.org.
  8. [10] . wikidata.org.
  9. [11] . wikidata.org.
  10. [12] . wikidata.org.
  11. [13] . wikidata.org.
  12. [14] . National Library of Israel. wikidata.org.
  13. [15] . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

Aggregate / graph-position facts

  1. [2] . Wikimedia Foundation. dumps.wikimedia.org.
  2. [16] . Wikidata sitelinks. wikidata.org.
  3. [17] . Wikidata aliases. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). two-source hypothesis. Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/two-source-hypothesis
MLA “two-source hypothesis.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/two-source-hypothesis.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_two-source-hypothesis_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{two-source hypothesis}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/two-source-hypothesis}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): two-source hypothesis — https://4ort.xyz/entity/two-source-hypothesis (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/two-source-hypothesis · Last refreshed: