The Trial of John Stewart
Scottish witch trial
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
The Trial of John Stewart
Summary
The Trial of John Stewart is a witch trial[1].
Key Facts
- The Trial of John Stewart is in the country of United Kingdom[2].
- The Trial of John Stewart's instance of is recorded as witch trial[3].
- The Trial of John Stewart's instance of is recorded as mixed trial[4].
- The Trial of John Stewart's point in time is recorded as +1697-05-19T00:00:00Z[5].
- The Trial of John Stewart's participant is recorded as John Menzies[6].
- The Trial of John Stewart's participant is recorded as Sir James Stewart[7].
- The Trial of John Stewart's participant is recorded as Francis Grant[8].
- The Trial of John Stewart's significant event is recorded as imprisonment[9].
- The Trial of John Stewart's significant event is recorded as commission of justiciary[10].
- The Trial of John Stewart's defendant is recorded as John Stewart[11].
- The Trial of John Stewart's charge is recorded as witchcraft[12].
- The Trial of John Stewart's first line is recorded as Pretrial notes: This case was under a Privy council commission (see PC1/51 p. 136-9) along with most of the people tried at the same time. There were other Renfrewshire witchcraft suspects tried at different places and times. I am keeping this as a mixed/central local because the Privy Council maintained very strict control over the proceedings, even though they granted a commission. For details of the proceedings of Privy Council in this matter see the no named witches case c/la/3235.[13].
- The Trial of John Stewart's place of detention is recorded as Renfrew[14].
- The Trial of John Stewart's connects with is recorded as trial of Agnes Naismith[15].
- The Trial of John Stewart's connects with is recorded as trial of Margaret Cunninghame[16].
- The Trial of John Stewart's Survey of Scottish Witchcraft - Trial ID is recorded as T/LA/1221[17].
- The Trial of John Stewart's quotation or excerpt is recorded as Trial notes: originally indicted on 13/4/1697, then the trial was postponed untill 12/5/1697. At the end of that trial, his trial (along with others) was postponed till 28/5/1697 no record of what happened or if that trial was even held.[18].