The Satanic Verses controversy
reaction of Muslims to a 1988 novel
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
The Satanic Verses controversy
Summary
The Satanic Verses controversy is a religious controversy[1]. It draws 489 Wikipedia views per month (religious_controversy category, ranking #3 of 8).[2]
Key Facts
- The Satanic Verses controversy is in the country of United Kingdom[3].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's image is recorded as Demonstranten met spandoek, Bestanddeelnr 934-4147.jpg[4].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's instance of is recorded as religious controversy[5].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's Commons category is recorded as The Satanic Verses controversy[6].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's point in time is recorded as +1988-00-00T00:00:00Z[7].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0118vt5j[8].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's significant event is recorded as 1989 firebombing of the Riverdale Press[9].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's facet of is recorded as The Satanic Verses[10].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's BBC Things ID is recorded as 48ab5dfa-2db8-4ecc-b152-f9cb515b6b7f[11].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's significant person is recorded as Salman Rushdie[12].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's significant person is recorded as Ruhollah Khomeini[13].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's Wolfram Language entity code is recorded as Entity["HistoricalEvent", "RuhollahKhomeiniIssuesFatwaAgainstSatanicVersesAuthorSalmanRushdie"][14].
- The Satanic Verses controversy's Encyclopedia of China is recorded as 105222[15].
Why It Matters
The Satanic Verses controversy draws 489 Wikipedia views per month (religious_controversy category, ranking #3 of 8).[2] It is known by 4 alternative names across languages and contexts.[16]