Home › Entities › request_for_comments › RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP

RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP

request for comments publication
Place request_for_comments Q47483762
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP

Summary

RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP is a Request for Comments[1].

Key Facts

  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP authored Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — author (P50): Warren Kumari[2].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's instance of is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[3].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's publisher is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — publisher (P123): Internet Engineering Task Force[4].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's DOI is recorded as 10.17487/RFC6472[5].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's language of work or name is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — language of work or name (P407): English[6].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's publication date is recorded as +2011-12-01T00:00:00Z[7].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's RfC ID is recorded as 6472[8].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6472[9].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's work available at URL is recorded as https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6472.txt[10].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6472.txt[11].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc6472.txt.pdf[12].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's number of pages is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+5'}[13].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's replaced by is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — replaced by (P1366): RFC 9774: Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP[14].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's title is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP[15].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's author name string is recorded as K. Sriram[16].
  • RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's DBLP publication ID is recorded as journals/rfc/rfc6472[17].

Body

Designation and Status

RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP's instance of is recorded as Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — instance of (P31): Request for Comments[3].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [3] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  2. [2] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  3. [4] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  9. [10] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  10. [11] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  11. [12] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  12. [13] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  13. [14] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  14. [15] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  15. [16] ↑ . RFC Index. Retrieved . wikidata.org.
  16. [17] ↑ . DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02. Retrieved . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP. Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp
MLA “RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP — https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/rfc-6472-recommendation-for-not-using-as-set-and-as-confed-set-in-bgp · Last refreshed: