principal–agent problem
0 sources
principal–agent problem
Summary
principal–agent problem is a scientific theory[1]. It draws 423 Wikipedia views per month (scientific_theory category, ranking #18 of 130).[2]
Key Facts
- principal–agent problem's instance of is recorded as scientific theory[3].
- principal–agent problem's instance of is recorded as economic concept[4].
- principal–agent problem's instance of is recorded as type of risk[5].
- principal–agent problem's GND ID is recorded as 4126353-4[6].
- principal–agent problem's subclass of is recorded as dilemma[7].
- principal–agent problem's subclass of is recorded as problem[8].
- principal–agent problem's subclass of is recorded as operational risk[9].
- principal–agent problem's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/036fz9[10].
- principal–agent problem's participant is recorded as principal[11].
- principal–agent problem's participant is recorded as proxy[12].
- principal–agent problem's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/agency-theory[13].
- principal–agent problem's significant person is recorded as Oliver E. Williamson[14].
- principal–agent problem's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as principal-agent-problem[15].
- principal–agent problem's STW Thesaurus for Economics ID is recorded as 11153-6[16].
- principal–agent problem's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 200707436[17].
- principal–agent problem's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C200707436[18].
- principal–agent problem's Investopedia term ID is recorded as p/principal-agent-problem[19].
- principal–agent problem's Great Russian Encyclopedia portal ID is recorded as otnosheniia-printsipal-agent-v-ekonomike-c91465[20].
- principal–agent problem's Yale LUX ID is recorded as concept/90c1e3e2-5374-4f93-9042-e883c668b8b9[21].
Why It Matters
principal–agent problem draws 423 Wikipedia views per month (scientific_theory category, ranking #18 of 130).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 23 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[22] It is known by 66 alternative names across languages and contexts.[23]