Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s
The New York Times article (June 11, 2021)
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s
Summary
Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s is an obituary[1].
Key Facts
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's instance of is recorded as Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s — instance of (P31): obituary[2].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's part of the series is recorded as Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s — part of the series (P179): Overlooked[3].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's language of work or name is recorded as Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s — language of work or name (P407): American English[4].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's publication date is recorded as +2021-06-11T00:00:00Z[5].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's main subject is recorded as Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s — main subject (P921): Jobriath[6].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/obituaries/jobriath-overlooked.html[7].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's published in is recorded as Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s — published in (P1433): The New York Times[8].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's title is recorded as Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s[9].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's author name string is recorded as David Chiu[10].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's article ID is recorded as 100000007722204[11].
- Overlooked No More: Jobriath, Openly Gay Glam Rocker in the ’70s's number of words is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+1492'}[12].