Misunderstanding Cults
0 sources
Misunderstanding Cults
Summary
Misunderstanding Cults is a literary work[1]. It ranks in the top 4% of literary_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (3 views/month).[2]
Key Facts
- Misunderstanding Cults authored Benjamin Zablocki[3].
- Misunderstanding Cults authored Thomas Robbins[4].
- Misunderstanding Cults's instance of is recorded as literary work[5].
- Misunderstanding Cults's editor is recorded as Benjamin Zablocki[6].
- Misunderstanding Cults's editor is recorded as Thomas Robbins[7].
- Misunderstanding Cults's language of work or name is recorded as English[8].
- Misunderstanding Cults's country of origin is recorded as Canada[9].
- Misunderstanding Cults's publication date is recorded as +2001-12-01T00:00:00Z[10].
- Misunderstanding Cults's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/0276mr8[11].
- Misunderstanding Cults's Open Library ID is recorded as OL19163710W[12].
- Misunderstanding Cults's has edition or translation is recorded as Misunderstanding Cults[13].
- Misunderstanding Cults's main subject is recorded as cult[14].
- Misunderstanding Cults's LibraryThing work ID is recorded as 1907374[15].
- Misunderstanding Cults's Library of Congress Classification is recorded as BP603[16].
- Misunderstanding Cults's title is recorded as Misunderstanding Cults[17].
- Misunderstanding Cults's subtitle is recorded as Searching for Objectivity in a Controversial Field[18].
- Misunderstanding Cults's OCLC work ID is recorded as 854411155[19].
- Misunderstanding Cults's form of creative work is recorded as edited volume[20].
- Misunderstanding Cults's Dewey Decimal Classification is recorded as 306.6[21].
Body
Works and Contributions
Authored works include Benjamin Zablocki[3], a sociologist[22], 1941–2020[23], of United States[24], specialised in sociology of religion[25] and Thomas Robbins[4], a sociologist[26], 1943–2015[27], of United States[28], specialised in sociology of religion[29].
Why It Matters
Misunderstanding Cults ranks in the top 4% of literary_work entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (3 views/month).[2]