Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy
0 sources
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy
Summary
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy is a legal case[1]. It ranks in the top 9% of legal_case entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1 views/month).[2]
Key Facts
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy is in the country of United States[3].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's instance of is recorded as legal case[4].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's instance of is recorded as decision of the Supreme Court of the United States[5].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's publication date is recorded as +1983-04-19T00:00:00Z[6].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/06w6ybj[7].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's significant event is recorded as oral argument[8].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as United States[9].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's legal citation of this text is recorded as 460 U.S. 766[10].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's legal citation of this text is recorded as 103 S. Ct. 1556[11].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's legal citation of this text is recorded as 75 L. Ed. 2d 534[12].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's legal citation of this text is recorded as 1983 U.S. LEXIS 21[13].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's published in is recorded as United States Reports[14].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's court is recorded as Supreme Court of the United States[15].
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy's majority opinion by is recorded as William Rehnquist[16].
Why It Matters
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy ranks in the top 9% of legal_case entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1 views/month).[2]