McDonald v. Chicago
0 sources
McDonald v. Chicago
Summary
McDonald v. Chicago is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States[1]. It ranks in the top 1% of decision_of_the_supreme_court_of_the_united_states entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (604 views/month).[2]
Key Facts
- McDonald v. Chicago is in the country of United States[3].
- McDonald v. Chicago's instance of is recorded as decision of the Supreme Court of the United States[4].
- McDonald v. Chicago's publication date is recorded as +2010-06-28T00:00:00Z[5].
- McDonald v. Chicago's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/06wc977[6].
- McDonald v. Chicago's significant event is recorded as oral argument[7].
- McDonald v. Chicago's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as United States[8].
- McDonald v. Chicago's legal citation of this text is recorded as 561 U.S. 742[9].
- McDonald v. Chicago's legal citation of this text is recorded as 130 S. Ct. 3020[10].
- McDonald v. Chicago's legal citation of this text is recorded as 177 L. Ed. 2d 894[11].
- McDonald v. Chicago's legal citation of this text is recorded as 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5523[12].
- McDonald v. Chicago's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as event/McDonald-v-City-of-Chicago[13].
- McDonald v. Chicago's published in is recorded as United States Reports[14].
- McDonald v. Chicago's United States Reports ID is recorded as 561/us/742[15].
- McDonald v. Chicago's court is recorded as Supreme Court of the United States[16].
- McDonald v. Chicago's majority opinion by is recorded as Samuel Alito[17].
- McDonald v. Chicago's U.S. Supreme Court docket number is recorded as 08-1521[18].
- McDonald v. Chicago's Google Scholar case ID is recorded as 10450488700560329027[19].
Why It Matters
McDonald v. Chicago ranks in the top 1% of decision_of_the_supreme_court_of_the_united_states entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (604 views/month).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 6 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[20] It is known by 3 alternative names across languages and contexts.[21]