judicial interpretation

Summary

judicial interpretation ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (84 views/month).^[1]

Key Facts

• judicial interpretation's subclass of is recorded as interpretation^[2].
• judicial interpretation's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/04qlfs^[3].
• judicial interpretation's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Legal reasoning^[4].
• judicial interpretation's Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ID is recorded as legal-interpretation^[5].
• judicial interpretation's ESCO skill ID is recorded as 5f5c4314-deae-4e5d-a378-32f55682735e^[6].
• judicial interpretation's applies to people is recorded as judge^[7].
• judicial interpretation's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 2780219900^[8].
• judicial interpretation's Encyclopedia of China is recorded as 231332^[9].
• judicial interpretation's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C2780219900^[10].
• judicial interpretation's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C2991800546^[11].
• judicial interpretation's ScienceDirect topic ID is recorded as social-sciences/interpretation-of-the-law^[12].
• judicial interpretation's class of object is recorded as constitution^[13].
• judicial interpretation's class of object is recorded as law^[14].

Why It Matters

judicial interpretation ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (84 views/month).^[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 10 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[15] It is known by 11 alternative names across languages and contexts.^[16]